LOVING STYLES AS PREDICTORS OF MARITAL SATISFACTION AMONG MARRIED COUPLES IN ANAMBRA STATE

Abstract

This study explored the predictive relationship between different loving styles and maritalsatisfaction among married couples in Idemili North Local Government Area, Anambra State, Nigeria. Theparticipants included 511 married individuals (276 men and 235 women) aged 25 to 40 years (mean age =26.64 years, SD = 5.90). Data were collected using the Styles of Love Inventory (SLI-70) by Philbrick andOwuamalam (1994) and the Index of Marital Satisfaction (IMS) by Hudson (1982). Multiple regressionanalysis revealed that loving styles significantly predicted marital satisfaction, accounting for 24% of thevariance (R² = 0.24, p < .001). Mania (obsessive love) significantly and positively predicted maritalsatisfaction (β = 0.231, p < .001), indicating that intense emotional engagement, even if obsessive, mayenhance relational quality in this cultural context. Pragma (practical love) negatively predicted maritalsatisfaction (β = -1.30, p = .027), suggesting that an overemphasis on practicality can diminish emotionalintimacy and satisfaction. Power (control) also exhibited a significant negative relationship with maritalsatisfaction (β = -0.158, p = .037), emphasising the detrimental effects of dominance-based dynamics.Similarly, Eros (passionate love) demonstrated a significant negative influence on marital satisfaction (β =-0.252, p = .001), highlighting the risks of overprioritising physical attraction and passion in long-termrelationships. In contrast, Storge (friendship-based love), Nomos (ethical love), Agape (selfless love),Logos (logical love), Ludus (playful love), and Ideal (aspirational love) were not significant predictors ofmarital satisfaction. These findings suggest that while certain love styles (e.g., Mania) may foster maritalsatisfaction, others (e.g., Pragma, Power, Eros) could undermine relational quality when not balancedeffectively. The study recommends integrating these findings into premarital counselling and maritalsupport programs to promote relational harmony. Future research should explore the culturalmultidimensional nature of love styles and their evolving impact on marital satisfaction over time.