REPORTING CORRUPTION IN NIGERIAN NEWSPAPERS: A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION OF THEMES, OWNERSHIP AND CHALLENGES.

Abstract

This study explores corruption reporting in Nigerian newspapers: a mixed-methods evaluation of themes, ownership, and challenges with a focus on The Punch and Premium Times. Employing both quantitative and qualitative data analysis, the study examined the frequency, themes, and framing of corruption stories over six years. The quantitative analysis counted corruption-related articles, categorized the types of corruption reported, and evaluated the prominence of these stories based on headline placement, word count, and page location. The qualitative analysis involved thematic coding, examining how corruption was portrayed and the narratives constructed around it. Findings indicated a high frequency of political corruption reporting, with public sector embezzlement and corporate corruption also prominently featured. Investigative journalism played a significant role in exposing corruption, particularly in Premium Times and The Punch. However, challenges such as threats to journalists and media ownership influenced the scope and nature of coverage. Addressing the gap in research on how media ownership shapes corruption reportage, the study revealed that political affiliations significantly impact editorial independence, affecting corruption coverage. These findings align with the agenda-setting theory, as the media’s emphasis on high-profile corruption cases shaped public discourse. The study concludes that while Nigerian newspapers have contributed to anti-corruption efforts, a broader and more balanced approach is needed to address under-reported areas of corruption. Recommendations for improving investigative journalism and ensuring editorial independence are provided.