ROLE OF TRADITIONAL RULERS IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN THE TARABA NORTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT OF TARABA STATE

Abstract

This study examined the role of traditional rulers in conflict resolution within Taraba North Senatorial District, Nigeria. The research was guided by two objectives: to explore the mechanisms used by traditional rulers to resolve conflicts and to identify the challenges they encounter in doing so. Anchored in Stakeholder Theory, the study employed a qualitative descriptive case study design. Data were collected through Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with 10 purposively selected participants, including first-, second, and third-class chiefs, as well as senior officials responsible for chieftaincy affairs. The findings revealed that traditional rulers rely on culturally rooted practices such as open compound hearings, layered reconciliation models, land walks to verify boundary claims, ritual reconciliation ceremonies, and symbolic restitution to maintain peace. Despite their continued relevance, the findings highlight numerous challenges undermining their effectiveness, including political interference, erosion of respect among younger generations, inadequate legal recognition, lack of training, and insufficient resources to enforce decisions. The study concludes that while traditional rulers remain indispensable stakeholders in community peacebuilding, their potential is significantly constrained by systemic and structural limitations. It recommends establishing a comprehensive legal framework to support traditional conflict resolution and implementing inclusive community engagement and capacity-building initiatives. By addressing these constraints, policymakers and practitioners can strengthen indigenous institutions and enhance sustainable conflict management in Taraba North and similar contexts.